Turn wildfire uncertainty into clear, site-specific decisions.
ZionDome builds a living digital twin of each property or site — then runs scenario analysis to reveal where it fails under real conditions (wind, embers, heat). The result is a ranked action plan that stakeholders can understand leading up to an event and defend after it.
Why digital twins matter for wildfire
Wildfire damage is driven by site-specific factors: slope, vegetation continuity, building geometry, ember pathways, and changing winds. A generic risk score doesn’t tell you what to fix first.
ZionDome uses a digital twin to answer:
- Where does this site fail first?
- Which actions move the outcome most?
- What should be deployed, and when?
- How do we prove readiness and track changes over time?
What the Digital Twin includes
Asset model
- Building footprint and key zones (roof, vents, facades, exposure edges)
- Critical areas (utilities, safe room, garage, high-value assets)
- Perimeter and access constraints
Terrain and fuels context
- Slope and elevation (spread dynamics)
- Vegetation/fuel continuity and defensible-space state
- Exposure directions and wind corridors
Operational context
- Readiness status and maintenance history
- Inspection notes and verification records
- Response roles and playbooks
The Scenario Engine
What we simulate
We run scenario-based analysis that reflects wildfire pathways:
- Wind-driven ember exposure and ignition pathways
- Radiant heat exposure zones
- Directional risk under forecast shifts
- Time-to-impact and response timing sensitivity
What you get from scenarios
- “Survive / fail” thresholds for each site
- A ranked list of the top actions that reduce severity the most
- Clear deployment triggers for active protection
- Maps and visuals that are easy to share internally
Outputs (shareable deliverables)
1) Digital Twin Risk Map
A visual site map with exposure drivers, failure points, and priority zones.
2) Ranked Mitigation Plan
A prioritized checklist that focuses on the actions with the highest expected impact.
3) Deployment Triggers & Playbooks
When conditions cross thresholds, the platform issues step-by-step actions for each role.
4) Verification Pack (optional)
Before/after state, inspection logs, and maintenance status — built for auditability.
Built for multiple stakeholders
- Owners/operators: clear priorities and deployment triggers
- Municipal teams: targeted prevention and defensible-space programs
- Insurers/reinsurers: underwriting-ready evidence of verified risk change
- Critical infrastructure: protection zoning and operational continuity planning
Pilot approach (recommended)
Launch a 30–60 day pilot
- Select 5–20 sites (or one municipal zone / 1–5 critical sites)
- Build baseline twins and risk state
- Run scenario sweeps and produce ranked action plans
- Configure playbooks and verification workflow
- Deliver shareable maps and evidence outputs
Frequently asked questions
Is this a one-time report?
No. The digital twin is updated as conditions change: vegetation status, maintenance, upgrades, and readiness state.
Do we need perfect data to start?
No. We start with the best available imagery and site context, then refine as more data becomes available.
How does this connect to insurance?
Underwriters need verifiable risk change. The digital twin ties actions to outcome drivers and packages results into shareable, audit-friendly evidence.
Call to action
Want a digital twin for your properties or sites?
Start a pilot and receive site-specific maps, ranked mitigation plans, and deployment playbooks from day one.
Book a Demo • Launch a Pilot